Fact Checking, Katie Elliott

I found the article titled "Boy on life-support after tonsil surgery" on CBC.ca/news.

• Both names of Morris Swan Shannacappo and Heidi Graham were spelt correctly and both were given proper titles.


• There was no math, unless you include his age. He is in fact 12 years old today. Which I discovered from a much more detailed article printed by the Winnipeg Free Press BEFORE the CBC article was posted.


• The CBC article says that the boy was rushed back to hospital because he was coughing up blood, but the Winnipeg Free Press adds that he was also suffering from the inability to breath and shortly after arriving at the hospital went into cardiac arrest.

The Winnipeg Free Press Article is much more detailed, and emotional. Plus it contained quotes and pictures (things which the CBC article did not). I find this lack of information, which was obviously available (since the W.F.P. article was published before the CBC one), to be poor work on the behalf of the CBC reporter.

NOTE: Image found at http://images.starcraftmazter.net/4chan/" >

Fact-Checking, Nancy Gordy

In the Edmonton Sun article on Keshroy Hillary Clinton's capture by Edmonton police, i was not able to find any spelling or grammatical errors. There also appeared to be no errors in the spelling of names and titles of people. I double checked the accuracy of that information by doing searches on google and locating a media release on the Edmonton Police Service web page. All of the important addresses and locations were correct, as well as important dates. The attribution throughout the article is done well. As the reader i am always aware of who said certain quotes and where information came from.

- "Cops nab city man on lam" by Richard Liebrecht, Edmonton Sun, Jan. 29/10

Accuracy is very important in journalism as it creates credibility. It creates loyal readers that have trust in the author. If a journalist's facts are wrong then it could also create trouble in the future with legal issues if it becomes a common error. When accuracy isn't consistent, a journalists work will become useless. A journalists role is to find the facts and present them in a truthful and accurate manner. Skipping the step of editing one's work for accuracy will create a major problem.

Note: Image from Tony Scida

Fact Checking, Susan Eder

Writer: Trish Audette and Archie McLean
Article: "Edmonton's Northlands hires lobbyist", denies it has arena plans
Newspaper: The Edmonton Journal
Date: February 1st 2010
Publisher: John McDonald

The article was critiqued for:Numbers & Math Names
Titles (people, books etc.)LocationsCompare quotes to notes/recordingQuote AttributionDefinitionsURLsSpelling & GrammarSpellchecker Errors

The only mistake found was that the name Jason G. Hatcher was missing the G. in his name.

THE IMPORTANCE OF ACCURACY
It is important to be accurate so that the reader will understand what the writer was trying to convey. The writer in this instance did a good job on being accurate. This is important for the credibility of the paper.

Fact-checking, Tyler Grant

Frank Landry of The Sun was off to a good start by spelling Mary Anne Jablonski correctly. That last name's tough, and I'm sure I would've had to qradruple check it to make sure it was right.

Mr. Landry also comments on a 2% budget cut that Ms. Jablonski is responsible for. I'm not sure what this 2% added to the unmentioned 98% totals. After some searching, I've discovered that Renata D'Aliesio of the Calgary Herald has said the dollar amount Ms. Jablonski's department is trying to trim $11 million. So, that means $11 million is a paltry 2% of a pile of money. Fortunately, the less fortunate of Alberta won't have to suffer this loss of many for the time being.

The funny thing is that Frank Landry's article is from February 1st, and Renata D'Aliesio's article is from January 28th.

Accuracy leads to crediblity. The more mistakes I read in an article, the less chance of me ever finishing it. With the two articles I read, I was left to wonder what surprises the 2010 alberta budget will hold. Is there really that much of a difference in information that is sent to Calagary and Edmonton? Someone's made a mistake here, but I'm not sure who. Back to fact-checking I go.

Fact-Checking, Isaac Kaplyuk

Female bomber kills 54 in Baghdad
The story was written by Juhi Bushra, from THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
Story from the Edmonton Sun website, found via Twitter.
This was published February 1st, 2010.
Link to the story: Click here.

The story says that a police official said 54 people total were killed, including 18 women and 12 children, and that 117 were wounded. When typed into Google search, using the headline as the key words, multiple results from msnbc.com, canoe.com, times.com, yahoo.com and many more reputable sites came up, all verifying the exact same numbers used by Bushra in THE ASSOCIATED PRESS story.

Facts taken from quotes within the story were properly attributed, and the one source used for this story, Maj. Gen. Qassim al-Moussawi is in fact spelt correctly, when the name is typed into Google search, many results containg the exact same spelling and title of this character come up, confirming his status, person and spelling of his name.

The locations, dates and times used within the story all check out when fact-checked using Google search. There appear to be no spelling errors, lack of quote attributions, or any kind of other error. There are no URL's within the story to speak of.


Accuracy is integral to journalism. An innaccurate story that provides innaccurate facts, and misleads the reader, will cause overall confusion among people who read the same article, when compared to an article that is accurate. Accuracy is necessary to deliver information correctly and to allow people reading it to understand it accurately, as well. With so much junk out there in the wireless realm, as well as the un-wired one, accuracy is key not only for good journalism, but is key for maintaining a cohesive and concise article that will be effectively understood by the masses that read it. In this case, the story appears to be accurate, giving a quick run-down of what happened, uses a reputable source when attributing quotes and information, and is, overall, an example of good journalism.

Note: Image taken from http://islamizationwatch.blogspot.com/2009/12/report-al-qaida-kills-eight-times-more.html. According to the story, the woman in the picture is very similiar to what the suicide-bomber would have looked like, with the bombs hidden underneath the cloak.

Fact-Checking, Matt White

The article I chose for this activity is titled:
Transit fares increase potentially a spark

By Justin Bell, Edmonton Sun. Last Updated Feb. 1, 2010.

The first item on the accuracy checklist is numbers and math. In this article there is a reference to the increase in transit fares for both single fares and bus passes. Both costs listed are correct, as they match the prices listed on the ETS homepage.

The second item on the checklist is names and titles. There are a couple names of citizens’ whose quotes were added to the story. There is no way to verify these names so we can only assume they have been spelt correctly. Other names include Stu Litwinowich and Patricia Dickson. I verified that Stu's name was spelt correctly through the Amalgamated Transit Union Homepage, but his title is actually "President Business Agent" as opposed to just "President." As for Patricia, I was able to find her name used in a similar article, and it was spelt the same way.

Many of the other items on the list do not apply. Location for instance, is obviously Edmonton.

Lastly, spelling and grammar. In the sentence "Her concerns about more bus violence was echoed by others," the word "was" is being used incorrectly. To fix this error the author could have done one of two things.
1. Her concerns about more bus violence were echoed by others.
2. Her concern about more bus violence was echoed by others.
I was unable to find any additional errors, but that doesn't mean there weren't any, it just means I can't find any.

To close, saying that accuracy is important in journalism is an under statement. It is the essence of journalism. Without accuracy, an article or piece is useless to its readers. All facts, dates, names, etc. must be 100 per cent accurate... otherwise, you're just another unqualified reporter pretending to be a journalist.

Image by Myke Waddy on Wikipedia.

Fact-Checking, Erik Nelson

Transit fares increase potentially a spark

This article was written by Justin Bell for the Edmonton Sun newspaper. It was published February 1, 2010 and was last updated at 12:17 p.m.

This article was written very with hardly any grammatical errors. The easiest error to spot is the article ending with a comma rather than a period.

In the sentence "There has been a recent spat of violence against drivers, with four having been assaulted in the past two months." A spell check identifies spat as a contextual error, and provides spate as a correction.

"Her concerns about more bus violence was echoed by others." A grammatical error is shown in this sentence that should be "Her concern about more bus violence was echoed by others."

Other than these few errors, the journalist made sure the information was correct.

Picture from Edmonton Sun / Picture taken by David Bloom

Crap Detection 101, Susan Eder

Check UPDATE BELOW April 13/10

"Crap Detection 101" by Howard Rheinghold

Note: image from Chris John Beckett on flickr.

(C) The article written in 2009, still applies today.

(R) The author provides balanced content and provides references by linking.

(A) The author's credentials can be found online. He is an author and an editor. He also teaches as well as has his own web site.

(P) The material is presented as fact.

UPDATE: APRIL 13, 2010 : Crap Detection 101

Note: Image from NMC Campus Observer

CRAP TEST: On Howard Rheinghold's article about "Crap Detection"

C: Currency: The date the article was written is June 30 2009. This is almost a year ago. Usually this would make a difference in how relevant and true the information would still be today. However, in this case, since the information has not changed that much, it is still viewed as current. If it was written 10 years ago, then no the facts would have to be updated. The site that the article in, is a current website that is maintained.

R: Reliability: The kind of information included in the resource section includes both opinion and web sites offering information on how to avoid crap as well as other tips. This opinion is gathered from experience. The opinion becomes fact when teaching us what he has learned to avoid faulty information. Some of the sites offer help in checking for errors.

A: Authority: The creator of this text is Harold Rheinghold. He is author of Tools for Thought, The Virtual Community and Smart Mobs. He was the editor for Whole Earth Review and he was an executive editor for Hotwired. Rheinghold taught digital journalism and social media at Berkley, Standford and De Montfort University in the UK. He is the author of CRAP 101. It would seem then that Harold Rheinghold has all the credentials needed to make his comments reliable. The site is published by the San Francisco Chronicle. The publishers state that all blogs are the opinions of the authors and not that of the publication. The advertisements on the website are few.

P: Purpose/Point of View: This is an opinion piece based on the facts as Rheinghold himself sees them. It is biased because it only gives us his views on how to sift through all the crap online. The only thing he is trying to sell us is information based on his point of view.

Crap Detection 101, Katie Elliott

BE WARY OF THE INTERNET

In hopes of finding CRAP in Howard Rheingold's article "Crap Detection 101", I find most of his information to pass the CRAP test, meaning it holds all the essential necessities required to be a useful source of information on the web: Currency, Reliability, Authority, Purpose/Point of View.
This being despite the fact that the article hasn't been updated since June 2009, and here we are already in February of 2010, the information still holds truth and the links all seem to still work properly. Even, to my surprise and horror, the very suspicious, shocking, and completely disturbing website for the LASIK do-it-yourself-at-home eye surgery. (Which I strongly recommend, you DO NOT try at home.)

A thorough bio of Rheingold is attached to the article, which definitely paints him as a credible source. There is a lot of his background information, including the fact that he teaches Digital Journalism at Stanford and Virtual Community/Social Media at Berkeley.

Over all, I believe this is a good source of information, especially for those who have yet to understand, that just because it is on the internet, doesn’t mean it is true. ….so, do you believe me?

NOTE: Image from Buncombe County News

Crap Detection 101, Tyler Grant

The first thing I noticed about Howard Rheingold's article is that it was posted on the 30th of June, 2009 at 3:12p.m. Has nothing changed in half a year? At the rate the internet changes, a lot of misinformation could arise that one would invariably have to sift through.

His credentials are top-notch though: he teaches at Berkley, Standford, and De Montfort University in England. Despite this, however, his references come from a drawn out anecdote about teaching his daughter how to wade through scores of crap to get factual information, his own internet habits, and the twitter posts of people involved in the election aftermath in Iran. How reliable is any of this?

This article seems to be his opinion. Although I am aware of some of the little tricks he uses, he often starts sentences with: In my opionion, I personally confronted, I, I, I.... and so forth. My advice to him is to use the eyes in head to catch the overuse of the I's on his page.

I'm still on the fence about him...

Read the article yourself.

Note: Image from Kolabora, Photo credit: Robin Good.

Crap Detection 101, Erik Nelson

Looking at Howard Rheingold's article Crap Detection 101, I will analyze to see how his work stands up to the method he teaches.

Currency - June 30 2009 at 03:12 PM was the date and time this article was posted. At seven months old, this article is quite dated. Regarding the information within the article, it is still current enough to remain useful.

Reliability - Within the article, the majority of information is tips thought of by the author. There are a few quotes from other sources, but they seem to back up the central point that Rheingold is trying to make. At the bottom of the article is a long list of resources with related pages to help users.

Authority - Crap Detection 101 was written by Howard Rheingold. He has also written three books, as well as being involved in numerous technology and communication publications and websites. He has also taught digital journalism and social media. Rheingold appears to be very knowledgeable in communications on the internet. The publishing site does not affiliate with blogs on their site and they state that the author is responsible for its content. The site does have advertisements.

Purpose/Point of View - The content in the article is coming from a biased view that the internet is filled with thieves and scoundrels that only intend to do users harm. It seems that Rheingold only really wants to educate people about the information available to them however, and he is not trying to sell any product to readers.

Overall, I'd recommend this article to others because it passes its own CRAP test and provides knowledgeable insight into the online world that can benefit many people who haven't yet adapted to the land of the internet.

Image from rheingold.com

Crap Detection 101, Isaac Kaplyuk.

What CRAP?

C-Currency; The information written herein Rheingold's article, 'Crap Detection 101', is semi-recent...it was published June 30th, 2009. The site itself is a current site, as it is the San Francisco Chronicle site, and journalistic sites like this must be maintained and updated daily. This entry is current to our topic, as the sites that Rheingold mentions in his report are all still relevant sites within the information realm, such as Twitter, Del.icio.ous, Youtube, and other modern web tools such as RSS feeds.

R-Reliability; The kind of information within this report is in itself about the reliability of other reports, or other bits of information that can be found on the web. This report isn't so much opinion as it is empirical and theoretical knowledge gathered over time, and with personal experience. Is the article balanced? Not really, because the article isn't really an opinion, it's pretty much a crash-course in spam detection, and tips and tricks that the savvy internet user can have at their disposal to avoid being mislead by untrustworthy information, and to better complete research without obtaining faulty information.

A-Authority; The creator of this text is a Howard Rheingold, who is pictured above and to the left. Rheingold is a published writer, artist and the creator of two ground-breaking web communities, Hot Wired and Electric Minds, and he also published his Crap Detection 101 on the San Francisco Chronicle, which adds to the article's credibility. These accomplishments make Rheingold a reputable source, and his interest/aim within this document is to alert people of the perils of info-searching on the web, and how to most efficiently go about doing this task. Although there are advertisements on the page, they are not of the author's doing, and are only as common as you'd expect would be on a news site.

P-Purpose/Point-of-View; The article isn't so much an opinion, but it is rather an article based on experience, which could only lead one to beleive that the statements and thoughts expressed within the article are stemmed from fact. The article is obviously biased, but biased towards people being aware of their actions on the web, and to aid in avoiding being duped on the internet, and to avoid being taken on information-wild-goose chases. The only thing that the author is trying to 'sell' here is information to help the average inter-web user to be more web-aware, and to help avoid useless or misleading information on the web.

Note: Image from oclg.org

Crap Detection 101, Nancy Gordy

"Crap Detection 101" by Howard Rheingold passes the CRAP test only to a certain extent. It is a fairly current article for the topic although it hasn't been updated since June of last year. The article is quite opinionated and this is demonstrated through his use of the words "to me..." and retelling his instances with his daughter.

In the resources, he allows people to suggest resources in the comments section in order to add to his story. I feel as if he should be finding resources on his own to back up his story. Rheingold doesn't use quotations and backs up his ideas only by providing links to sights that can be used for detection purposes.

The site in which this article is posted on indicates that it is not responsible for any of the content written and that it does not write or edit any of the content either. It also indicates that the authors display their own perspectives. Rheingold does have some credentials behind his name.

Advertisements are displayed on the right hand side of the web page and on top which takes away from the article.

It seems that this article is opinionated and focuses only on Rheingold's experiences with locating information on the Internet. He is trying to sell us his way of fact checking.

Howard Rheingold's Article

Note: Image from Joi on flickr.

Lecture 4: Fundamentals of Accuracy

In today's class we will review "Crap Detection" by Howard Rheinghold and focus on some basic tenets to ensure accuracy in our writing.



Activity 1:

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/rheingold/detail?entry_id=42805
Perform the “CRAP” test on Rheinghold’s article
Write a blog entry (not a comment) on your findings
Include an image that relates to your topic
Remember: remain professional and neutral in your writing style and tone



CRAP Test:

Currency –

• How recent is the information?
• How recently has the website been updated?
• Is it current enough for your topic?

Reliability –

• What kind of information is included in the resource?
• Is content of the resource primarily opinion?  Is it balanced?
• Does the creator provide references or sources for data or quotations?

Authority –

• Who is the creator or author?
• What are the credentials?
• Who is the publisher or sponsor?
• Are they reputable?
• What is the publisher’s interest (if any) in this information?
• Are there advertisements on the website?

Purpose/Point of View –

• Is this fact or opinion?
• Is it biased?
• Is the creator/author trying to sell you something?

Examples of Common Mistakes

Names and titles - these go wrong more than anything else
Numbers and math – “Anytime journalists get their hands on numbers and math there’s a huge probability that things will go wrong” ~ Craig Silverman
Typos -You can blame spell check programs for some of these though it's best not to rely on these programs
Misquotes and misidentifications – “I’ve seen a lot of men become women, mothers become daughters" (Silverman). It can get really bad when identifications are mixed up and a crime is involved.


Activity 2:
Go online
Look for a factual or grammatical error in a local news publication
Add your finding (with a link to the original article) and correction as a comment to today’s lecture post

20 minutes


Checklists:
In a 2000 article for the British Medical Journal, James Reason (one of the world’s leading researchers of human error) emphasised that “it is often the best people who make the worst mistakes - error is not the monopoly of an unfortunate few.”


Examples of Checklist:
Detroit Free Press 



We Regret the Error - Accuracy Checklist:

Activity 3:

Find a news story in a local publication
Go on a fact-checking mission
Complete as many of the accuracy check-list points
Create a blog post
Include all bibliographic information of your chosen story
Include your analysis of accuracy errors and corrections
Embed an image appropriate to your topic
Write a short paragraph on the importance of accuracy in journalism


Homework:
Read Chapter 4

HTML INFORMATION: To make your links in a comment "clickable" use this formula:
< a href="URL GOES HERE">url or key word here< /a >
REMEMBER to remove spaces before the < and > brackets!


Note: Top image, "Fact or Crap," from Calendars.com.au.